Towards a Conceptual Knowledge Management System Based on Systems Thinking and Sociotechnical Thinking
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper contributes to the field of knowledge management arguing that knowledge management research should be grounded in both systems thinking and sociotechnical thinking. Systems thinking enables the treating of knowledge management broadly, as a complex system, not limited to knowledge management processes, but encompassing other essential elements related to managing knowledge at an organization. Sociotechnical thinking considers both social elements and technology equally important in managing knowledge. The two above mentioned approaches are used to support the idea that, in order to successfully manage knowledge, a balanced sociotechnical knowledge management system should be designed at an organization. The article seeks to investigate the main elements of such a system and to show how these elements relate to each other demonstrating that a strong correlation exists between the knowledge management process and strategic leadership. research methodology. To address these needs, new ideas and models are being proposed, concepts analyzed, new hypotheses formulated, research data presented and interpreted, and important contributions towards understanding the management of knowledge are being made. However, at this point, a theoretical and methodological base of knowledge management has not been yet well-established. Therefore, a strong theoretical and methodological foundation is still needed for better understanding the essence of the phenomenon and for establishing a well-grounded knowledge management DOI: 10.4018/jskd.2011070103 International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 3(3), 40-55, July-September 2011 41 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. discipline which offers theoretical perspectives and valuable practical insights. The paper aids the researchers who seek to understand the complexity of knowledge management by underlying the idea that knowledge management is effective only when an adequate knowledge management system (KMS) is developed at an organization. A knowledge management system is rather a new object of research and development, especially in its broad sense. Narrowly, the term “a knowledge management system” is used in literature as a synonym for an information technology based system, applied to managing organizational knowledge (Alavi, 2001). KMSs, from this point of view, are associated with information systems, and many of the tools and techniques of knowledge management are related to information systems (King, 2009). In general, when researchers discuss such KMSs, they refer to the intranet, databases, groupware, search engines, e-mail, decision support systems, expert systems, document management systems, etc. This paper, however, is focused not on the technology side in developing a KMS. The definition of a KMS, used in this article, has been based on the analogy with a complex system. According to Simon (1962), a complex system is the one that consists of many unique and interacting elements, which have equally important effects on the outcomes produced by the system. In such systems, the whole is more than the sum of the parts. Thus, the behavior of such a system could not be understood by a detailed analysis of some particular elements. The investigation of the whole system behavior is needed. In the case of knowledge management, this means that a detailed analysis of separate aspects of knowledge management (for example, separate knowledge management processes, information systems used to maintain the flows of information and knowledge at an organization, processes of organizational learning, etc.) could not let us understand the whole system. Thus, a broad knowledge management context should be analyzed. Adopting this perspective, a KMS is treated as a complex system which includes interacting elements. These elements are both social and technical; and they are equally important for effectively managing organizational knowledge. Thus, the cornerstone of this article is the recognition that both systems thinking and sociotechnical thinking should be used as a basis for analyzing and developing a KMS. A number of models of sociotechnical KMS have been discussed earlier in literature (Coakes, 2002; Handzic, 2011; Meso & Smith, 2000; Okunoye & Bertaux, 2006; Pan & Scarbrough, 1998, 1999). Yet, there is no generally accepted structure of such a model. Some of these models propose similar elements, other elements are different. After a detailed analysis of the existing models, some essential limitations could be identified. The main limitation of the existing models is their major focus mostly on the context that maintains successful knowledge management. However, these models do not show how this context relates to the knowledge management processes. Moreover, the relationship between the structural elements of a KMS is not broadly discussed in the context of the existing models. Recognizing this gap, current paper not only presents the elements of a conceptual KMS, but also explains how these elements interact. The purpose of this paper is to suggest systems thinking and sociotechnical thinking as a foundation for a conceptual model of a KMS by determining social and technical elements and by pointing out their interrelatedness in such systems. In order to achieve this purpose, research literature analysis and a survey have been selected as the main research methods. The article has been divided into two main sections. The first section provides arguments why both systems thinking and sociotechnical thinking should be taken into consideration in knowledge management research. This section of the article presents a theoretical and methodological foundation for the proposed model of a sociotechnical KMS which is further 14 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/towards-conceptual-knowledgemanagement-system/55551?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Communications and Social Science. Recommend this product to your librarian: www.igi-global.com/e-resources/libraryrecommendation/?id=2
منابع مشابه
Governance and Capacity to Manage Resilience of Health Systems: Towards a New Conceptual Framework
The term resilience has dominated the discourse among health systems researchers since 2014 and the onset of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. There is wide consensus that the global community has to help build more resilient health systems. But do we really know what resilience means, and do we all have the same vision of resilience? The present paper presents a new conceptual framework on go...
متن کاملTime to Shift from Systems Thinking-Talking to Systems Thinking-Action; Comment on “Constraints to Applying Systems Thinking Concepts in Health Systems: A Regional Perspective from Surveying Stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean Countries”
A recent International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) article by Fadi El-Jardali and colleagues makes an important contribution to the literature on health system strengthening by reporting on a survey of healthcare stakeholders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) about Systems Thinking (ST). The study’s main contributions are its confirmation that healthcare stakeholde...
متن کامل“Wood Already Touched by Fire is not Hard to Set Alight”; Comment on “Constraints to Applying Systems Thinking Concepts in Health Systems: A Regional Perspective from Surveying Stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean Countries”
A major constraint to the application of any form of knowledge and principles is the awareness, understanding and acceptance of the knowledge and principles. Systems Thinking (ST) is a way of understanding and thinking about the nature of health systems and how to make and implement decisions within health systems to maximize desired and minimize undesired effects. A major constraint to applyi...
متن کاملFractal Population Ecology Theory
Abstract Purpose - The aim of this paper is to describe the population ecology theory through fractal thinking, an emergent human operating system that is creative, adaptive, healthy, and evolutionary; furthermore, a parallel is drawn between the population ecology model and the fractal structure. Top-down hierarchies are typically characterized by command and control systems of the authority t...
متن کاملProviding a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Systems Thinking of Primary School Principals
The purpose of this research is to provide a model of the antecedents and consequences of systems thinking of primary school principals. This research is qualitative research based on grounded theory. The statistical population included school principals, education experts, and faculty members. Using the purposive sampling method with maximum diversity, 24 people were conducted as participants ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- IJSKD
دوره 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011